Online Forum for RFT GMW-MPP-1006
In order to submit a post you must be logged in, have downloaded specification documents for this tender and the tender must not be closed.
|RFx Number Status & Type||Details||Date|
Request for Tender
Issued by: Water Efficiency Project
UNSPSC 1: 81101701 - Electrical engineering services - 30%
UNSPSC 2: 72151203 - HVAC solar energy construction service - 70%
Fri, 28 May 2021 12:00 pm
Fri, 02 July 2021 2:00 pm
Supplier Post #22 - Site Inspection This post is publicly visible
We understand a site inspection was previously scheduled and cancelled but due to the easing of covid lockdown circumstances changing in Victoria can a request for an independant site visit be made and if so who can we schedule this with?
Posted on 23 June 2021 22:01 by Supplier Person
Thanks for the inquiry. The project is unable to accommodate an independent site visit prior to the RFT Closing Time.
As a result of the non-compulsory site visit being cancelled due to covid restrictions, and to assist Tenderers, the Project uploaded additional drone footage and images to TendersVIC. Refer to document numbers 14, 15 & 18.
Tenderers may specify any assumptions/exclusions relating to site conditions in their Tender as part of Returnable Schedule 6b.
Replied on 24 June 2021 14:43 by Kylie Dulson of Water Efficiency Project
Supplier Post #21 - BESS sizing This post is publicly visible
For the BESS sizing does the load peak at 70kW or is it a continous load of 70kW?
Posted on 23 June 2021 16:15 by Supplier Person
The BESS must be able to provide both charging and discharging at a continuous rate of 70kW.
Replied on 28 June 2021 17:01 by Kylie Dulson of Water Efficiency Project
Supplier Post #20 - Compliant BESS size clarification This post is publicly visible
We are seeking clarification on our interpretation of compliant BESS sizing.
The tender advertises a 250kWh nominal capacity battery, which, reading the general specification (clause 8.3) we understand to be the nominal rating that "shall" be achieved at the end of the battery life (i.e. factoring degradation this will not be the initial nominal capacity). Clause 8.6 of the general specification requires batteries to have a minimum design life of 10 years.
With the above in mind, can you confirm our interpretation is correct - that a compliant BESS solution will be rated at 250kWh nominal capacity (at minimum) 10 years after installation?
Posted on 18 June 2021 13:30 by Supplier Person
Tenderers may assume degradation to provide a nominal capacity of 80% at the 10 year point, which equates to oversizing the BESS by 25%.
Tenderers can provide manufacturer documentation as part of their submission to confirm that degradation rates of their proposed system in its installed context will be lower (better) than this, then the oversizing can be reduced correspondingly.
Replied on 24 June 2021 15:19 by Kylie Dulson of Water Efficiency Project
Supplier Post #19 - Local Industry Development Plan (LIDP) This post is publicly visible
The LJF Policy applies to standard projects above the threshold values of:
- $1 million or more in regional Victoria, or
- $3 million or more in metropolitan Melbourne.
- Any project valued at less than $3 million that the Minister has declared to be a standard project.
As the project value do not meet the threshold , Is it still considered as standard project (point 3)?
details to be kept confidential please.
Posted on 18 June 2021 10:28 by Supplier Person
Thanks for your request for clarification.
The Local Jobs First Policy is applied at the project value, rather than the estimated value of an individual procurement package.
The Mitiamo Pipeline Project value exceeds $1m & is based in regional Victoria.
Please refer to https://localjobsfirst.vic.gov.au/ for further detail.
Replied on 21 June 2021 16:11 by Kylie Dulson of Water Efficiency Project
Supplier Post #18 - Lightning Protection This post is publicly visible
We have performed an AS/NZS 1768 risk calculation in preparing our compliant solution, but we'd like to know if GMW has any specific LPS (i.e., type I, II, III, IV) requirements at this site - especially if those would exceed 1768 principles/guidance?
Thanks in advance.
Preference for my details to be kept confidential
Posted on 17 June 2021 19:12 by Supplier Person
As a guide:
- Tenderers should make allowance for surge diverters to ensure all electrical, control and instrumentation equipment shall be protected against surges and transients imposed on the signal and power lines and antennae by lightning or electrical switching.
- Tenderers should make allowance to provide any necessary additional protective device(s) to ensure that the Calculated Risk is lower than the Acceptable Risk for all loss categories in accordance with AS/NZS 1768. The acceptable risk levels will be agreed with GMW during the detailed design phase.
- Tenderers can outline the measures proposed in Returnable Schedule 4
Replied on 24 June 2021 12:33 by Kylie Dulson of Water Efficiency Project
Buyer Post #17 - Information existing Pump Equipment This post is publicly visible
As requested during the Tender Briefing held 8 June 2021, some information on the existing pump equipment at the Site has been made available.
Refer document reference no: 16. Buyer Post #17 Pump Equipment information.
The information covers all 7 pumps at the Site (3 x jockey pumps, 3 x main pumps and 1 x winter storage pump) and includes make and model number.
Posted on 17 June 2021 15:00 by Water Efficiency Project
Buyer Post #16 - Smart Meter This post is publicly visible
Further to a question raised during the Tender Briefing held 8 June 2021, the Project provides the following information.
The minimum metering requirement is to enable the monitoring as per Section 9.9 of RFT Part C.
The submeters installed for the BESS and PV would need to perform this functionality which includes as a minimum output power, voltage, current, power factor.
Posted on 17 June 2021 14:02 by Water Efficiency Project
Buyer Post #15 - Vegetation Management for Site This post is publicly visible
Further to a question raised during the Tender Briefing held 8 June 2021, the Project advises native vegetation has been assessed and the trees have been mapped on the design plans.
The trees are to be avoided. A No Go Zone is to be established around the Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) of the trees at 12 x Diameter at Breast Height (DBH).
Posted on 17 June 2021 10:30 by Water Efficiency Project
Buyer Post #14 - Flood Map This post is publicly visible
Further to a question raised during the Tender Briefing held 8 June 2021, the Project advises a flood map can be accessed via: http://floodreports.nccma.vic.gov.au/#/
Posted on 16 June 2021 17:11 by Water Efficiency Project
Buyer Post #13 - Cultural Heritage Management Plan This post is publicly visible
Further to a question raised during the Tender Briefing held 8 June 2021, the Project advises a Cultural Heritage Management Plan is unlikely required as the site is not in an area of Cultural Heritage Sensitivity.
Posted on 16 June 2021 17:07 by Water Efficiency Project
Supplier Post #11 - Drone footage This post is publicly visible
Thank you for uploading the drone footage today, it helps to provide some additional context. We're wondering if there is any available drone footage that focuses a bit more toward e.g., the proposed array location, proposed BESS location, etc.?
Thanks in advance.
Preference for my details to be kept confidential
Posted on 15 June 2021 14:33 by Supplier Person
Some additional drone footage has been uploaded today. Refer Document No. 18 GMW-MPP-1006 Drone Footage 2
Replied on 17 June 2021 15:20 by Kylie Dulson of Water Efficiency Project
Supplier Post #9 - Grid AFC response This post is publicly visible
Could GMW please provide any corespondence received from the DNSP regarding the grid application for connection. Any communication that shows the basis of the 30kW export limit.
Posted on 15 June 2021 12:33 by Supplier Person
Refer to DNSP pre-approval assessment - document reference no: 17. Supplier Post #9 DNSP export limit
Replied on 17 June 2021 15:03 by Kylie Dulson of Water Efficiency Project
Supplier Post #8 - Corrosion rating This post is publicly visible
What is the site Corrosion rating C3-C4?
and what is the site Terrain Category?
Posted on 10 June 2021 14:32 by Supplier Person
Corrosion rating: refer to Tender Briefing Q&A document – Question no. 7.
Site Terrain Category: generally considered as TC2.
Replied on 15 June 2021 12:21 by Kylie Dulson of Water Efficiency Project
Supplier Post #7 - Ground Mount Manufacturer Clarification This post is publicly visible
In the General Specification document it states:
Ground mounting equipment is to comprise purpose designed proprietary systems provided by one of the following, or approved equivalent manufacturers that meet the same level of standards:
IXL assembles a product we would be prosing for the tender, would that meet the above requirement?
Posted on 10 June 2021 13:12 by Supplier Person
The Tenderer is referred to RFT Part C, section 9.8.2 where IXL are listed as one of the Manufacturers for ground mounting equipment.
Replied on 15 June 2021 12:26 by Kylie Dulson of Water Efficiency Project
Supplier Post #6 - Photos of existing electrical building This post is publicly visible
We're hoping you could provide additional photos of the interior of the existing electrical building intended to house the PV inverters and PVDB (as indicated in RFT Part E - Drawings) ? We would like to understand the space we have available for installing our propsed equipment.
Preference for details for be kept confidential
Posted on 9 June 2021 15:37 by Supplier Person
Thanks for the request. Images have now been uploaded.
Please refer to document reference: '14. Supplier Post #6 Images (inside exist elec bldg)' .
Replied on 15 June 2021 12:20 by Kylie Dulson of Water Efficiency Project
Supplier Post #4 - Inverter and Battery Brand This post is publicly visible
In the technical specifications, Goulburn Murray Water specifies that the inverter should be SMA or an approval equivalent, and the battery should be ABB, BYD, Tesla or an approved equivalent.
Would you consider Fimer, Fronius and Sungrow as possible alternative inverter brands.
Posted on 7 June 2021 13:38 by Supplier Person
Tenderers are referred to RFT Part C, Section 9.7.2 Manufacturer:
“Manufacturer SMA, or approved equivalent.
All inverters (and other associated equipment) to be installed as part of the system are to be listed on the Clean Energy Council list of approved products (where relevant to component)”
Replied on 9 June 2021 14:14 by Mikaela Thomas of Water Efficiency Project
Buyer Post #3 - Site Inspection 9 June 2021 cancelled This post is publicly visible
Tenderers are advised the Site Inspection planned for 9 June 2021 has been cancelled due to current covid restrictions.
The project is hoping to reschedule the Site Inspection to an alternate date, however, this will be subject to the easing of restrictions.
The Project will keep Tenderers informed via this forum and https://www.tenders.vic.gov.au/
Posted on 4 June 2021 08:34 by Water Efficiency Project
Supplier Post #2 - Occupational Health and Safety Standard This post is publicly visible
Can we please confirm if demonstrating pending accrediation to an approved OHS assurance system would be acceptable to GMW.
Posted on 3 June 2021 17:46 by Supplier Person
Pending accreditation’ at the time of tender submission of an acceptable Occupational health and safety assurance system would not be acceptable to the Project.
The Tenderer is referred to RFT Part A, Section 7, Item 2 and RFT Part B Section 3.
Replied on 4 June 2021 16:24 by Mikaela Thomas of Water Efficiency Project